247th Divorce Court Houston Texas
247th Divorce Court Houston Texas
The 247th Divorce Court of Houston Texas is located on the 15th floor of 201 Caroline in the new civil courts building of Harris County Texas. You can check documents filed in your case and pending settings by going to the district clerks website at district clerk. The 247th Divorce Court in Houston, Texas website can be found here. Judge John Schmude has been on the bench since 2015 and serving as his associate, Judge Paula Vlahakos.
Practicing law before the 247th Divorce Court Houston, Texas.
The presiding judge is Judge John Schmude. This is a family law district court of Harris County, Texas. The associate judge is Judge Paula Vlahokas. The docket is called at 930 am. Uncontested hearings start about about 830 am. Published policies of the 247.
The court rules state that both the attorney and parties must attend mediation prior to temporary orders. The hearings will treat the following matters: conservatorship together with possession or possession alone and access is at issue, or in the case the total time spent for a hearing is more than three hours. Meditation prior to final trials would be required in all cases, even if the parties attended meditation prior to temporary orders.
With the parenting classes, the court respects the Harris County Local Rule 12, but generally does not enforce a parenting class requirement. In all cases, classes are not required, however, where there is an adoption or modification. Pre-trials are considered in the event of jury trials or any trial that will last more than four hours, when such conferences will be required. The issuance of scheduling orders will be made six months after the filing of a case. A case will not generate a new DWOP out of the reasons for missing entries or reset entries.
The parenting coordinators or facilitators may be accepted in the case the parties request them or the motion of the Court includes it. In the case of the parties agree to the use of parenting coordinators or facilitators, the Court is likely to accept this type of agreements. If there is the need for children’s preferences or chamber interviews, the Court will treat these matters case by case.
The situations where preferential settings can be made regard matters that have been reset on several occasions or because of time constraints, the Court was not able to comply. Motions for continuance are eligible in the situation when a case is pending for less than one year, and the reset can be made by both parties in compliance with Rule 11 agreement, directly with the Court Coordinator. In the situation, when the case has exceeded one year of pending, there is the need for filing a motion for continuance and set for hearing, regardless if it is an unopposed or agreed on the motion.
If the law requires it, Amicus appointments can be made in the Court. The parties will choose the Amicus or Ad Litem. If no agreement is made, the Court will decide instead of the parties. When this type of appointment is optional, the parties can decided whether to appoint one. Again, if the parties cannot come to a common consensus, then the Court can make the choice for them. The Court can decide the need for appointing an Amicus, and the parties are allowed to agree on the Amicus or Ad Litem. The Court’s motion can also make such decision.
About the Author
Michael Busby Jr. is a divorce and bankruptcy attorney in Houston, Texas who appears in court at least 3 times a week. He has 14 years experience in the Houston, Texas family law and federal bankruptcy courts.I also appear frequently for divorce and other family law matters in this Houston, Texas divorce court. I have tried property cases and child custody cases in this court within the last year.
Busby P.C. 2909 Hillcroft Suite 350
Houston, Texas 77057